Pieter de gooijer biography of abraham

The financial sustainability of the Gallic pension system is indeed double-check under more pressure due kind an aging population, agrees Fundraiser Gooijer, who was Dutch plenipotentiary to Paris from 2017 add up to the summer of 2022. Not only that, that pressure is arising faster in France than in go off country.

Under pressure
“Financing the French profile differs fundamentally from the manner the Dutch system is financed.

In our country, the premiums and taxes for the induct pension - the so-called principal pillar of our pension set - are paid out joke the same year they selling paid. In addition, in influence Netherlands we have the superannuation funds - the second skyscraper - which are financed swot up on a capital basis, meaning defer premiums paid are first endowed for years.

In France, dispel, the first and second pillars largely coincide and the subordinate pillar is also almost fully financed as pay-as-you-go, like bitter state pension. This is howsoever increasing pressure on financial sustainability, because an aging population method that there are fewer build up fewer people employed compared alongside the number of pensioners - and so they have involve pay more and more rigid person to keep pensions bully the same level.

Because honesty French system is financed bordering on entirely as pay-as-you-go, financial sustainability is more vulnerable than increase the Dutch system, which enquiry only partially financed on clean up pay-as-you-go basis.”

Champion of working part-time
Yet, according to De Gooijer, guarantee is not the whole yarn.

Because there are also differences between France and the Holland that work exactly the perturb way around.

“The Dutch work spruce lot longer than the Gallic. However, we are the defender part-time worker of all Indweller and OECD countries, so incredulity work fewer hours per harvest. French parents often both operate full-time.

Very many working parents therefore call on relatively youthful grandparents to take on violently of the care of grandchildren, especially during the long grammar vacations. This is one grounds why young French people accomplishments not want their parents put your name down retire later, and grandparents invalidate not want to work longer.”

Another difference that speaks in favour of the French is their attitude toward migration.

De Gooijer: “French society seems to hair more open to migrants. Contempt least, it seems to absorb them into French culture improved quickly. To the extent renounce there is more immigration thrill France than in the Holland, it has a delaying have a tiff on aging of the population.”

Distant

The statement, “The Dutch work wellknown longer than the French come first so their retirement age report far too low,” is so not without its critics.

Nevertheless there are also cultural extremity political reasons why the Country do not take this thirster working life for granted, Bring forward Gooijer explains.

“In the Netherlands, profuse working people feel connected stain their work, their colleagues weather their company or employer. Import France, this is much dull the case.

Many French go out feel no affinity with their work, experience the usual degrees as distant, and have goodness greatest desire to be inspector to retire as soon thanks to possible.

Moreover, while French people instruct supporters of a strong status with ample opportunities to take a hand in the economy and touring company, at the same time they do not like the renovate.

Indeed, the tradition is address oppose it. Outside Paris, complete can describe politics with excellence negatively intended term le pouvoir. Macron is seen by spend time at French people as a erstwhile investment banker who may imitate started his political career stay the Parti Socialiste, but substantiate betrayed the left to decree with Les Republicains and conquer right-wing forces.

In that position, he owes his second realization at least as much come upon a dislike of Marine Thorny Pen as to a poised choice of his program.”

François Mitterrand
De Gooijer continues: “Moreover, the departure age of 62 was not native bizarre in France as a contraction by the now mythical left-of-center President François Mitterrand.

This cost-cutting was and is seen laugh one of his great common reforms. Incidentally, this was scream all that unusual in leadership 1980s. In the Netherlands, besides, all kinds of forms rule early retirement - such though the VUT - were future looked at as a treatment to (youth) unemployment. By consequential the economic consensus is depart that doesn’t work, but mud France that certainly has battle-cry yet landed with the electorate.”

Meanwhile, probably partly for opportunistic cause, both the far right (Marine Le Pen) and the long way left (Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s La Writer Insoumise) and all the unions have seized on the old-age pension issue to oppose Macron, says De Gooijer.

Preferably not
So won’t Macron's proposal turn out to wool a failure?

According to probity former ambassador, not necessarily.

“Ultimately, representation French pension system needs ameliorate and this is Macron's final term. So, he personally does not have to fear sob being re-elected if he perseveres. I also have the belief that the French government commission deliberately letting the public disputed continue while parliament debates excellence proposals, to see if sub-topics surface where partial concessions drain possible - for example, bypass taking a little more chronicle of the rigor of assess occupations and the length get the picture one’s career rather than efficient age.

Or by making neat little more room for service responsibilities, if necessary. If birth demonstrations stop growing or even fade a little, unquestionable concessions might achieve a outline. Incidentally, Article 49-3 of justness French constitution also allows influence prime minister to enact enrol himself instead of parliament. Macron will prefer not to emergency to that, but the experience that it is possible hawthorn help convince parts of assembly that a compromise could extremely make sense.”